# Gate 2B.1 Primary-Scene Review

**Status:** Ready for owner review; not accepted and not production engineering  
**Artifact:** local Gate 2B.1 site  
**Canonical basis:** Kiduna Core Taxonomy Version 1.3.3  
**Design question:** Can the accepted one-center shell make the three Realms unmistakably different through their intelligence, Stance, contribution boundary, authority, and Records rather than decorative themes?

## Scope and evidence boundary

### Inherited requirements

- The Field is always-present context, even when it is not continuously visible.
- Realms and authorized Actors may remain active, contribute, and request attention.
- Every Agent acts from a Source of authority; a Connection does not grant authority.
- Privacy and visibility remain distinct.
- Consequential Actions require the correct Gate and durable evidence of what occurred.

### Owner-accepted constraints

- Gate 1 one-center shell: one active Realm, one current Focus, one dominant conversational surface, and one continuous conversation.
- No more than three elevated objects.
- At most one quiet, material Field-attention signal.
- No Atlas, permanent product navigation, visible operational machinery, exceptional scenes, production engineering, or deployed-prototype change.

### Working proposals tested

- The review rail is prototype-only and explicitly labeled as not product navigation.
- The medical Scene, collective-learning instrument, and oral-history instrument are fictional behavior studies.
- Focus, Attention Thread, Lens, Stage, Contribution Envelope, and one-center shell remain non-canonical design language.

## Scene 1 — Inner Clinic

| Acceptance criterion | Result | Observable evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Realm and patient-understanding Focus identifiable immediately | Pass | Persistent Realm identity and plain-language Focus sit above the continuous Mara–Ki thread. |
| One Realm and no more than three elevated objects | Pass | Authorized Source set, review/consent state, and clinician-reviewed Scene are numbered 01–03. |
| Four truth layers work without color alone | Pass | Documented, clinician-interpreted, illustrative, and unknown each use a written label, distinct symbol, and distinct border treatment. |
| Patient-specific claims reach dated authorized Sources | Pass | Operative note, imaging, and clinician review open into a dated Source Lens with issuer and applicability statement. |
| Consent and named clinician review visible before completion | Pass | Patient consent and Dr. A. Shah’s dated review are visible in the final Scene and persistent review strip. |
| Ki refuses unsupported diagnosis/prognosis | Pass | Ki explicitly limits the explanation to issued records and says it cannot diagnose, predict, or fill gaps. |
| Portal return preserves context | Pass | “Return through Portal” produces an explicit continuity receipt preserving conversation, selected moment, questions, and Record. |
| Plumbing and unrelated health modules stay hidden | Pass | No chart browser, appointments, calendars, integrations, or research feed appears; one non-applicable research check remains quiet. |

## Scene 2 — The Nature of Work

| Acceptance criterion | Result | Observable evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Private reflection and shareable Artifact are separate | Pass | They are separate numbered objects with different scope and object language; the private text is never the contribution itself. |
| Organization cannot inspect private conversation | Pass | The private object explicitly names managers, sponsors, Wizards, and team as unable to inspect it. |
| Contribution terms reviewable before sending | Pass | Scope, attribution, permitted use, retention, withdrawal, and accepting steward appear before the Confirmed Gate. |
| Synthesis states coverage and exclusions | Pass | 11 eligible, 3 excluded by scope, and 2 nonparticipants are visible. |
| Dissent remains visible | Pass | A minority/alternative interpretation appears beside the supported theme. |
| Ki does not invent consensus | Pass | The synthesis explicitly says it does not represent everyone and identifies optional participation. |
| Program authority required for Action | Pass | The team learning steward is named; the experiment remains ready and unexecuted. |
| No surveillance/dashboard pattern becomes primary | Pass | No task board, sentiment chart, people grid, member score, or manager view appears. |

## Scene 3 — 2nd Cavalry

| Acceptance criterion | Result | Observable evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Veteran retains pause, skip, redact, and stop control | Pass | All four controls are visible and interactive; redaction preserves the safe draft. |
| Original and derivatives remain distinct | Pass | Original waveform/audio, transcript derivative, and linked official Source have different labels, symbols, custody, and treatment. |
| Release terms visible before submission | Pass | Attribution, audience, use, service verification, sensitive passages, and withdrawal limit appear before the Deliberate Gate. |
| Ki does not improve memory | Pass | Ki explicitly says it will not supply details or improve Ray’s memory. |
| Service verification remains purpose-specific | Pass | Verification is visible only to the archive steward. |
| Related Sources are context, not correction | Pass | The after-action report is labeled “related context · not a correction.” |
| Confidential SADUNA content excluded | Pass | No SADUNA launch, founder, legal, governance, or financial content is present. |
| Accepted contribution creates provenance/custody Record | Pass | Submission produces Record OH-73E-0048, preserves the original, and keeps the transcript correctable. |

## Set-level review

- All three scenes use the same shell, structure, typographic hierarchy, and primary action language.
- Realm difference is behavioral: clinical applicability/review, consented collective learning/anti-surveillance, and archival custody/testimony control.
- Each scene has exactly one attention signal and exactly three elevated objects.
- Consequential paths name authority, Gate, expected effect, stop/recovery choice, and resulting Record.
- Browser review at 1280×720 found no horizontal overflow or runtime error.
- One shell-scroll defect discovered during interaction testing was corrected; the header and Focus now remain stable while scene contents scroll independently.
- The local production build and two rendered-site checks pass.

## Studio scorecard

| Criterion | Score | Evidence |
|---|---:|---|
| Dominant focus | 2 | One Focus line and one dominant instrument per scene. |
| Calm starting state | 2 | Realm, Focus, privacy boundary, and one next consequential path are immediately legible. |
| Conversational usefulness | 2 | Dialogue creates or bounds the actual instrument rather than decorating navigation. |
| Realm intelligence | 2 | Source applicability, contribution eligibility, and custody/provenance change behavior. |
| Element clarity | 2 | Relevant objects are typed, numbered, inspectable, actionable, and able to recede into a receipt. |
| Progressive disclosure | 2 | Source detail and Action Gates appear only on request. |
| Trust and authority | 2 | Consent, privacy, scope, authority, Gate, provenance, and Records are visible at consequence. |
| Recovery | 2 | Portal continuity, keep-private/withdrawal, pause/redact/stop, versioning, and correction are explicit. |
| Visual character | 2 | Restrained espresso, cream, blue, rare gold/mint, and composed geometry remain warm and precise. |
| Spatial precision | 2 | Stable shell and numbered object grammar preserve hierarchy across all three scenes. |
| Taxonomy fidelity | 2 | Canonical distinctions govern behavior; non-canonical design terms are labeled as proposals. |
| Capability evidence | 2 | Each scene demonstrates the named path rather than relying on labels or inactive controls. |

**Total:** 24/24; no automatic-fail condition observed.

## Keep, cut, change, test next

### Keep

- One-center shell and continuous conversation.
- Realm identity as a quiet, persistent grounding layer.
- Exactly three elevated objects with source/authority/Record behavior.
- Realm-specific trust grammar rather than decorative Realm theming.
- One quiet Field signal only when material.

### Cut

- Nothing in the approved primary-scene scope requires removal before owner review.

### Change

- No change is recommended before the owner evaluates whether the three Realms feel behaviorally distinct and emotionally right.

### Test next — only after owner direction

The bounded next experiment would be Gate 2B.2: the three already-defined exceptional scenes, using these same shells and changing behavior rather than adding error copy. It has not started.

## Gate recommendation

**Ready for owner review.** Advance only if the owner accepts the three primary scenes or supplies bounded revisions. Do not begin the exceptional scenes, Atlas, broader capability work, or production engineering yet.

## Taxonomy impact

**No taxonomy change.** Gate 2B.1 applies non-canonical design patterns to Canonical Version 1.3.3 and creates no new canonical decision.
