# Gate 2A Completion Audit

**Audit date:** July 19, 2026  
**Result:** Ready for owner review; not accepted  
**Taxonomy:** Canonical Version 1.3.3  
**Prototype state:** Gate 1 unchanged; Gate 2B not started

## 1. Deliverable completeness

| Required deliverable | Evidence | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Taxonomy 1.3.3 plus change log | `references/canonical-taxonomy-v1.3.3.md`; `TAXONOMY_IMPACT_LOG.md` | Pass |
| Updated source register and provenance | `SOURCE_REGISTER.md` includes paths, titles, status/date, confidentiality, pages, hashes, inspection date, and web checks | Pass |
| Classification ledger | `GATE_2A_EVIDENCE_LEDGER.md` separates inherited, accepted, owner, evidence, proposal, contradiction | Pass |
| Shared collective-agency/contribution model | `COLLECTIVE_AGENCY_MODEL.md` | Pass as working proposal |
| Semantic relationship model | `FIELD_REALM_SURFACE_RELATIONSHIPS.md` | Pass; unresolved visual questions explicit |
| Three complete Realm contracts | Three `REALM_*.md` files complete every contract dimension | Pass |
| Nine intentions and nine exceptions | `GATE_2A_INTENTION_AND_EXCEPTION_FLOWS.md` | Pass |
| Cross-Realm matrix | `CROSS_REALM_BEHAVIOR_MATRIX.md` | Pass |
| Six Gate 2B briefs | `GATE_2B_SCENE_BRIEFS.md` contains exactly one primary/exception pair per Realm | Pass |
| Updated logs and plan | Decision, open-decision, contradiction, working-plan, taxonomy-impact files | Pass |

## 2. Completion-criteria audit

| Criterion | Result | Evidence / unresolved boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Each Realm behaves differently because of purpose, Wisdom, Stance, authority, and relationships | Pass | Cross-Realm matrix and contracts; behavior identification test included |
| Each Realm demonstrates useful intelligence before machinery is configured | Pass as design definition | Default experiences, actors, intent flows, and non-goals defined; actual usability awaits Gate 2B |
| Collective agency and ongoing activity are explicit without continuous Field visibility | Pass | Taxonomy §1/§3; shared activity states; Attention Thread proposal |
| Cross-Realm attention avoids notification/project dashboard | Pass as bounded proposal | One material Attention Thread and seven priority conditions; usability untested |
| Every important contribution has scope, provenance, consent, authority, visibility, retention, and correction | Pass | Contribution Envelope plus contribution tables in all three contracts |
| Personal Ki relationships and collective learning coexist without surveillance/invented consensus | Pass as policy model | Taxonomy Ki safeguard; Nature of Work four-channel model and anti-surveillance test |
| Medical use cases meet source, consent, uncertainty, clinician-review, privacy, and escalation safeguards | Pass as definition; not clinically/legal validated | Inner Clinic contract and flows; C-007–C-009 remain open |
| Historical use cases preserve provenance, rights, contested accounts, dignity, correction, and continuity | Pass as definition; archive authority unresolved | 2nd Cavalry contract and flows; C-001/C-002/C-015/C-016 remain open |
| Confidential/proposed/legacy/unverified Service Alliance material remains distinguishable | Pass | Source register, evidence ledger, contradiction register, Realm contract; public scene brief excludes confidential mechanics |
| Field, Realm, Panel, Element, Lens, Stage, Scene, Portal, and Atlas have distinct purposes | Pass with explicit non-canonical boundary | Taxonomy boundary + relationship model; C-013/C-014 remain open |
| Each Gate 2B scene has observable criteria and one named hypothesis | Pass | Six briefs, each with a hypothesis and checkboxes |
| All deliverables are internally consistent with Version 1.3.3 and registers | Pass after static audit | See §4; owner decisions remain open, not contradicted |

## 3. Evidence/source audit

- Supplied PDF: 17/17 pages rendered/visually inspected; SHA-256 recorded.
- Confidential SADUNA DOCX: 8/8 rendered pages visually inspected; revision/date/confidentiality/hash recorded.
- Service Alliance market DOCX: 17/17 rendered pages visually inspected; metadata/hash recorded.
- Owner commentary: full text inspected; hash recorded.
- Current primary web checks: organization missions, HHS privacy guidance, Library of Congress oral-history model, and VA Gulf War illness terminology; URLs and inspection date recorded.
- Conflict between 3,192 public Dragoon Base members, 4,377 archived profiles, 4,371 invitations, and “over 4,400” Association membership remains open rather than reconciled.

## 4. Internal consistency checks

| Check | Expected | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Current taxonomy named 1.3.3 in controlling program documents | Yes | Pass |
| Version 1.3.2 retained, not overwritten | Yes | Pass |
| Atlas identified as proposed, not Field/canon | Yes | Pass |
| One active Realm / Focus / dominant surface preserved | Yes | Pass |
| Gate 2B and prototype remain unimplemented | Yes | Pass |
| Calendar/permission exceptions no longer define the Realms | Yes | Pass |
| Medical diagnosis/treatment/prognosis authority not invented | Yes | Pass |
| Private Ki conversation excluded from organizational synthesis | Yes | Pass |
| Original testimony separated from transcript/interpretation/Scene | Yes | Pass |
| SADUNA backbrief remains confidential/proposed | Yes | Pass |
| All 19 contradictions remain identifiable by ID | Yes | Pass |

## 5. Open evidence preventing production readiness

Gate 2A definition can be reviewed, but none of the Realm systems is implementation-ready because the following authorities/evidence are absent:

- Inner Clinic legal/clinical custodian, participating agreements, care authority, data policy, source corpus, and clinical validation.
- The Nature of Work Organization charter, Program sponsor/governance, participant agreement, OD source corpus, facilitator authority, and employment/privacy review.
- 2nd Cavalry Association adoption, current archive inventory and custody, contributor rights, editorial governance, accurate population/object counts, migration authority, and service-provider credentials.
- Legal/current status of Service Alliance LLC/SADUNA/Kiduna Club relationships and permission to disclose confidential details.
- User validation of Attention Thread, Contribution Envelope, Collective Reflection, and Scene necessity patterns.

These are readiness gaps, not silent design assumptions.

## 6. Taxonomy-impact result for this turn

**Taxonomy updated:** Version 1.3.2 → Version 1.3.3. Exact changes and provenance are in `TAXONOMY_IMPACT_LOG.md` and the final boundary section of the canonical file.

## 7. Gate decision

**Recommendation:** Review and revise Gate 2A. Do not activate Gate 2B until the owner accepts:

1. Taxonomy Version 1.3.3;
2. the shared collective-agency/contribution model;
3. the three Realm contracts; and
4. the exact six-scene Gate 2B set.
